Court rejects expanded view of prevailing-wage law

A state court has reversed a decision that could have added millions of dollars in costs to construction projects financed with bonds issued by municipal authorities.

What’s the issue: Whether the prevailing wage should apply to projects funded by bonds issued by municipal authorities. The prevailing wage is typically set at levels higher than what workers would otherwise earn.

  • The Department of Labor & Industry initially ruled that prevailing wages would not apply to the Ursinus project, which was funded by bonds issued by the Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority
  • But the decision was appealed by a Philadelphia labor union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98
  • An administrative appeals board sided with the union in a June 2021 ruling, arguing that the bond funds would not have been available to Ursinus in the absence of the authority, thus making the funds public
  • Ursinus appealed to Commonwealth Court, which reversed the board’s ruling in a 21-page ruling written by Judge Michael Wojcik
  • The college had argued that the Montgomery County authority never touched any of the money. It simply facilitated the bond issuance.
  • “We received the opinion and believe the Commonwealth Court correctly reversed the Prevailing Wage Board’s decision,” a college spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement. Ursinus was represented by West Shore law firm Bybel Rutledge.
  • “Had the Board’s decision been permitted to stand, it would have changed the face of public/bond financing in PA by converting private construction projects to public projects simply because a public body is involved and regardless of whether a penny of public funds was used,” attorney Catherine Walters of Bybel Rutledge wrote in an email. “This would add approximately 25%-45% to the benefits and wage costs of the project.”
  • A spokesperson for Labor & Industry declined to comment.

Why does it matter: Municipal authorities float bonds for a wide range of private-sector projects, including hospitals, university buildings and senior-living facilities.

What’s next: IBEW Local 98 is considering its options, including an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, according to union spokesperson Frank Keel.

  • “Everything is on the table,” he wrote in a text message.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated from its original version to include the correct name of the law firm — Stevens & Lee — providing an analysis of the ruling.

Share:

Gladly Sponsored By:

More Central PA News

Utz names next CEO 

After steering one of the region’s largest private companies onto the public market, Utz Brands CEO Dylan Lissette is stepping into a new role. After 27 years

Read More »

York law firms link up

Three York-based law firms are becoming one in a merger slated to close Oct. 1. The firms are Blakey Yost Bupp & Rausch; Griest Himes Herrold Reynosa; and MPL

Read More »